Signal 01
Thin content
Too little on the page to answer anything, with the word count on the row so the call is quick.
Analyzers · Index Bloat
Every site accumulates pages nobody meant to publish, and the crawler doesn't know which ones you meant.
Searchscope finds them and makes a call on each one. Not a list of URLs to review. A verdict per page, with the traffic and the word count behind it.
Every site accumulates them. Tag archives from a plugin nobody configured, paginated stubs, near-duplicates left behind by a migration, a category page with three products on it.
They earn nothing and get crawled anyway, so the crawler spends its budget on them instead of on the pages you care about. Seven separate rules look for them, because bloat arrives in more than one shape.
Signal 01
Too little on the page to answer anything, with the word count on the row so the call is quick.
Signal 02
Indexed and crawled across the whole window, and never once shown to anybody.
Signal 03
Shown occasionally, earning nothing worth the crawl it takes to keep it there.
Signal 04
Two pages asking for the same billing in the results, so neither gets a clean run at it.
Signal 05
Close enough that Google has to pick one, usually not the one you would have picked.
Signal 06
Buried so far down the structure that the crawler rarely gets there, and readers never do.
Signal 07
Published, indexed, and linked to by nothing at all on your own site.
Finding bloat is easy. Deciding what to do with each page is the part that takes judgment, so every row arrives with the call already made.
Nothing is deleted for you. The verdict is a recommendation with the traffic and the word count attached, so you can disagree with it in a second rather than in an afternoon.
Verdict 01
The strongest of a duplicate set. Keep it, point the others here.
Verdict 02
Fold the content into a page that already earns, and redirect.
Verdict 03
Worth keeping, currently too thin to rank for anything.
Verdict 04
Real for users, not for search. Keep the page, take it out of the index.
Pruning tools have a habit of recommending removal on volume alone, which is how a page with modest but steady traffic ends up redirected into oblivion.
Every verdict carries the traffic behind it. A page earning clicks is never marked for removal, and one you disagree about can be ignored, which takes it out of the queue without losing the record.
Ask the Strategic Advisor whether it's worth doing against everything else in the queue. Send it to Content Studio when the fix is a writing job. Mark it applied and the Impact Tracker takes a baseline, then reports what followed.
Connect a site and the analyzers read it end to end, then hand back the short list.